So I’ve begun a-plotting a couple of short stories, plus a novel. This involves a lot of sitting down and asking myself questions about who my characters are and what I want to happen in the book and then writing down answers.
The book is pretty nebulous at this point (as are the short stories, but today I’m doing novel plotting). I have a concept, some characters, things I know I want to have happen, and a general idea of how the book will feel. When I ask myself questions, I’m discussing possibilities with myself – do I want my protagonist to come from, this background, or that one? Given a situation, how will she react? Where is she character-wise at the beginning of the story? How does she feel about her life? What do I want her to learn over the course of the book? How does the book start? What’s my opening scene?
It’s frustrating, because for almost every answer I see different ways that things could go, different ways the character will respond to plot points, all leading to different endings. Some of these lead to more challenging writing for myself, others are an easier route (that is not to say an easy way out. It’s a book for chrissakes, none of it is easy). If I take the more difficult route, it might make the book more interesting to write. Or it could be a colossal failure if I’ve overreached my abilities and I might give up in despair. If I take the easier route, I might succeed beautifully and create something solid, or I might bore myself to tears. So. Which? What am I capable of?
And every time I answer a question, every time I make a decision, I take the book closer to being something solid, something formed, something writable. But I also slice away a realm of possibility, ways the book could have gone. Interesting characters and plot threads will now never be born, because the book just isn’t going to happen that way.
It’s exciting to see the book come together, yet I lose something with every slice, with every answer. As the book goes from being a concept, interesting and pristine and lovable but only in my head, I have to give up the book I wanted to write, which was a totally ephemeral concept, and start the book I can write, the book that will take solid form on paper. I have to accept that I will never write the thing that was in my head (to the extent that it was in my head at all and not a foggy idea of an idea and the thrill of creation that it gave me), I will only write an approximation of it. I can only write it one way. Perhaps when I’m finished I will think to myself “Yes, this is the only way it could have gone”. Or maybe I’ll find out I have an entirely different book from the one I wanted to write. Or maybe I will think “Aah, I should have made x happen, when instead I wrote y.” I have no way of knowing at this point.
That’s the trouble. I wish I could look at all of the possibilities, all of the decisions ahead and say “Yes, yes that is the one that will produce the best possible book”. It’s just not that simple. I have to make what seems the best decision for now, so I can make other decisions and get the darn thing written. However all I see right now are possibilities. Possibilities that are equally likely, equally interesting. And the stakes? Perhaps the difference between a good book and a bad book, or a good book and a great book. Or the difference between a publishable story (or the first draft of one) and something I should consign to the dark corners of my hard drive.
In any case, though, the decisions have to be made in order for the book to get written. So I should get back to it.
Posted by Ceri under Scribbles | 2 Comments »